Volume 2
- Number 2 (2009)
Volume 3
- Number 1 (2010)
- Number 2 (2010)
Volume 4
- Number 1 (2011)
- Number 2 (2011)
Volume 5
- Number 1 (2012)
- Number 2 (2012)
Volume 6
- 2013
Volume 7
Volume 8
- Number 1 (2015)
- Number 2 (2015)

CALL FOR PAPERS YEAR 2017

IMPORTANT DATES:
Submission Due Date: May 12, 2017
Notification to Authors: May 31, 2017
Journal Publication: July 15, 2017 onwards


EDITORIAL BOARD

Journal of Engineering & Technological Advances
Chief Editor:
Dr. Chia Chee Ming
Deputy Chief Editor:
Dr. Leelavathi Rajamanickam
Editors:
Prof. Omar Munir
Dr. Yap Pow Seng
Pn. Salmaliza Salleh
Mr. Chen Woon Choong
Ms. Kate Lam Woon Yee
 
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Sciences Research
Chief Editor:
Dr Neeraj Malhotra
Deputy Chief Editor:
Prof. Dr. Jamaludin Zainol
Editors:
Datuk Dr Khairiyah Abd Muttalib
Prof. Dr Nyan HL
Assoc. Prof. Tey Kim Kuan
Assoc. Prof. Ong Bee Leng
 
Asia Pacific Journal of Business, Humanities & Education
Chief Editor:
Dr. Mahiswaran Selvanathan
Deputy Chief Editor:
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Stanley Yap
Editors:
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Firdaus Low Abdullah
Dr. Mahadevan Supramaniam
Dr. Chong Wei Ying
Dr. Ramachandran Ponnan
 
 
THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONAL COMMITMENT, ORGANISATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOUR AND PERCEIVED JOB PERFORMANCE AMONG EXECUTIVES: A CASE STUDY OF SEGI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
Author : Chan Shirley
Formats available : Flipbook (English)
You have : FREE Access
 
View Full Text Article
Read Article Online Download PDF
 
Abstract
This research investigates the relationships between employees' Organisational Commitment (OC), Organisational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) and their immediate superior's perceived Job Performance (JP). It is also done to examine if OC mediates between OCB and JP. The respondents include 115 executives with job grade 7 and above who worked for SEGi University College (SEGi UC). The instruments used were the Meyer and Allen's (1997) OC Questionnaire (OCQ), Podsakoff's (1990) OCB Questionnaire (OCBQ) and Annual Performance Appraisal 2008. The results indicated that there was a positive relationship between OC and OCB. However, there was no relationship found between OC and JP. The OC was found to be positively related to the JP. Lastly, it is evident that the OC did not act as the mediator between OCB and JP in this context. Other contributing factors to the participants' JP gathered from the focus group discussion were highlighted.
 
Authors(s) Affiliations
SEGi University College